Responses to CPUC Scoping Memo and Ruling of Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judges
Responses
-
Supporting Document Response to Scoping Memo of Ventura County on behalf of 3C-REN, Tri-County Regional Energy Network, for approval of its Residential Energy Efficiency Rolling Portfolio Business Plan and Budget (May 15, 2017)
-
Response of the Association of Bay Area Governments, on behalf of the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Energy Network (CPUC # 940) to the April 14, 2017 Scoping Memo and Ruling of Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judges regarding 2018-2025 Rolling Portfolio Energy Efficiency Business Plan (May 15, 2017)
-
Response of the Local Government Sustainable Energy Coalition to the April 14, 2017 Scoping Memo and Ruling of Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judges (May 15, 2017)
-
Comments of Marin Clean Energy on Scoping Memo and Ruling of Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judges (May 15, 2017)
-
Response of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39-M) to Attachment A of the Scoping Memo and Ruling of Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judges (May 15, 2017)
-
Southern California Edison Company's (U 338-E) Responses to Questions in Attachment A of the Scoping Memo and Ruling of Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judges (May 15, 2017)
-
Response of Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) to the Request for Supplemental Information (May 15, 2017)
-
The County of Los Angeles, on behalf of Southern California Regional Energy Network (CPUC #940) Energy Efficiency Business Plan Supplemental Information (May 15, 2017)
-
San Diego Gas & Electric Company's Responses to Supplemental Questions (May 15, 2017)
